Still here

Feb. 25th, 2026 03:25 pm
likeadeuce: (Default)
[personal profile] likeadeuce
Watching as many adaptations of 'Wuthering Heights' as I can get my hands on, professional tennis, or updates on the baby monkey at the Japanese zoo that's having trouble making friends.

How are you?

AI and Dreamwidth

Feb. 25th, 2026 12:11 pm
mark: A photo of Mark kneeling on top of the Taal Volcano in the Philippines. It was a long hike. (Default)
[staff profile] mark posting in [site community profile] dw_dev

We've seen some questions lately about AI and how it relates to Dreamwidth, especially around scraping and training. Rather than answer piecemeal, I wanted to talk through how [staff profile] denise and I are thinking about this and try to be explicit about some things.

Dreamwidth is a user-supported service. We don't build the service around monetizing user data, and that informs how we approach AI just like it informs everything else we do.

Your content and AI training

Dreamwidth does not and will not sell, license, or otherwise provide user content for AI training. We have not and will not enter into data-access agreements for AI training purposes.

We will continue taking reasonable technical steps to discourage large-scale automated scraping, including known AI crawlers, where it is practical to do so. No public website can prevent scraping with absolute certainty, but we will keep doing what we reasonably can on our side.

AI features on Dreamwidth

Dreamwidth will not introduce AI features (and we have no current intention of doing so) that use or process user content without a public discussion with the community first.

We're only phrasing it like this because we can't predict the future and who knows what will be possible and available in five or ten years, but right now there's nothing we can see wanting to add.

If that ever changed, the conversation would happen openly before any decisions were made.

Site admin uses of AI

Keeping Dreamwidth usable means dealing with things like spam and abuse, and that sometimes requires automated admin tools to be more efficient or effective.

We are not currently using AI-driven systems for moderation or similar decisions.

If we ever decide that an AI-based tool would help address a site admin problem like spam, we will explain what we are doing and how it works (and ask for feedback!) before putting it into use. Any such tools would exist only to make it easier and more efficient for us to do the work of running the site.

AI and code contributions

Dreamwidth is an open-source project, and contributors use a variety of tools and workflows.

Contributors may choose whether or not to use AI-assisted tools when writing or reviewing code. Dreamwidth will not require contributors to use AI tools, and we will not reject contributions solely because AI-assisted tools were used.

For developers: if you use any AI-assisted development tools for generating a pull request or code contribution, we expect you to thoroughly and carefully review the output of those tools before including them in a pull request. We would ask the community not to submit pull requests from automated agents with no human intervention in the submission process.

I think it's important and I want to be able to review, understand, and maintain any contributions effectively, and that means humans are involved and making sure we're writing code for humans to work with, even if AI was involved.

Important note: this applies to code only. We expect any submitted images or artwork (such as for styles, mood themes, or anything else) to be the work of a human artist.

And to be very explicit, any AI-assisted development does not involve access to Dreamwidth posts or personal content.

In short summary

  • Dreamwidth does not and will not provide user content for AI training
  • Dreamwidth have not and will not enter data-sharing agreements for AI training and we will do what we can to prevent/discourage automated scraping by AI companies
  • Dreamwidth will not introduce AI features without a public discussion first
  • Any site admin use of AI tools will be explained openly and part of a public conversation
  • Contributors can choose their own development tools for code, but we do not accept images or artwork generated by AI

Oh, and we'll probably mention this (or a subset of this that isn't code related) in an upcoming [site community profile] dw_news post, but will defer to [staff profile] denise on that!

Taste Test - Stargate Atlantis (PG)

Feb. 25th, 2026 03:10 pm
goddess47: Emu! (Default)
[personal profile] goddess47 posting in [community profile] romancingmcshep


Title: Taste Test
Author: [personal profile] goddess47
Character(s): John Sheppard, Rodney McKay
Pairing(s): John Sheppard/Rodney McKay
Rating: PG
Length: 158 words
Warnings: none

Notes:

For [community profile] mcsheplets prompt #143 - pink

For [community profile] romancingmcshep 2026

For Fluffbruary 2026 prompt day 25 - berry


Summary:

"Try these!" Rodney held out a handful of neon pink berries. "They look like grapes!"


Good Eating on AO3

james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll


The Good Society Bundle featuring Good Society, the Jane Austen-inspired tabletop roleplaying game from Storybrewers Roleplaying.

Bundle of Holding: Good Society (from 2024)

~Bugs me how he's playing that thing.

Feb. 25th, 2026 10:27 am
zarla: juan corrida playin guitar (juanstrummin)
[personal profile] zarla
I watched this vid recently about Suno.ai and AI generated music which was really interesting, if bleak. At one point, the guy asks people who use Suno three questions.

The first question was what did Suno do that DAWs and traditional music couldn't do? And the answers came down to three recurring things: it was fast, it was cheap, and it replaced having a friend to talk to about your work.

The second question was if people thought that they had a unique style in their AI music, and the answer was obviously no. A few people tried to say the parts they contributed like lyrics were unique to them, but come on now.

The third question, which really fascinated me, asked who their favorite AI artists were, and what AI artists influenced or inspired them. Obviously no AI artists were mentioned because it's all slop, but the majority of respondents said "me". Like, the music they were generating was their favorite. Some people said that their own AI generated music was the only thing they listened to anymore, because why listen to anything else? The music they were generating was exactly to their tastes.

One of the things that tech billionaires need to do to keep the money flowing for them is to create needs where there aren't any, then sell you a solution to that need. This gets clear in the first couple minutes of the video, where the Suno CEO talks about how music needs to be more like video games because video games make a lot of money, and why can't music do that too! We need to gamify music, make it multiplayer, sell meaningful consumption experiences! The arrogance of thinking you need to fix music of all things is so repellent to me, but vultures gotta vultch. The CEO talks a lot about giving "power to the people" re: making music, which the guy points out isn't giving power to the people, it's giving power to Suno. Suno goes down, and suddenly all those people aren't making music anymore.

Anyway, trying to get back to my original point, the answers to the second and third question keep going around in my head. Not having your own distinct style or voice didn't seem to matter to a lot of the Suno users, although a few of them seemed a bit shame-faced about not having one, thus trying to make excuses about how they really DID have one if you squint. The entire point of a creative art to me is finding and expressing your own voice, having something to say. Something you want to get out. Not having a style or voice and not really caring really emphasizes what music is to these users - a product, something to consume until the next thing. Notably, something that doesn't involve other people at all.

The third question, where they just listened to their own slop music forever, is so masturbatory and they were all so strangely proud of it. Combined with the previous answer, where all the music being generated has no unique style or aspects to it, where nothing the creators are putting into it is coming out in any kind of meaningful way, emphasizes how disposable music has become in this mindset. This isn't accounting for people trying to make money off this slop either, although that's another aspect of it.
(As the refrain goes, why should I bother reading/listening/watching something no one could be bothered to make? Because maybe if i make enough slop i can make free money money money money)

But the three questions have a uniting theme throughout them - it's isolating. Don't ask a friend for advice or help with a song you're making, ask the company! Don't worry about developing a unique style or voice or standing out in any way, disappear into the masses and enjoy product! Don't listen to other people's music or talk with them or make groups to connect with each other, just listen to your own product! You don't need anyone else, just Suno and your product! All you need is Suno! Just give Suno your money and accept that Suno is the future, it's so easy! You get product made just for you! Except not really, but close enough! Don't need people or community or skills, just Suno!

It made me think about a post I wrote a while back about Hypnospace Outlaw, about the very human desire to create communities wherever we can, even if that space is inherently hostile to that desire. When humans can connect, we hold onto that as long as we can, usually until something forces our hands apart. God knows Twitter is a horrible cesspit, but people stay there because they've made communities there, they know people there (and they need money sometimes, but aside from that). People are willing to put up with a lot to keep a community, it's hard-wired into us. We want to talk to and interact with each other in one way or another. The guy in the video points out that the second the Covid restrictions went down, people went out to concerts and stuff as quickly as they could because we want to see each other in real life. We want to see music.

The Suno model, which can extend out to most GenAI models, is inherently an isolating thing. It lets you create what you want without any input from anyone else, gives you a fake friend you can talk to so you don't have to talk to a real person. It can do it fast and cheap, and it's almost good enough. You get wrapped up in a bubble of just what you want to hear, something that doesn't need other people because AI can present enough of an illusion of a real person. And this isn't happening in a vacuum, tech billionaires want to encourage reliance on their services so you'll keep paying for it.

Although there is an interesting wrinkle to this - the Suno CEO said he didn't want people using it to go into self-isolating bubbles like that, that he wanted to encourage "multiplayer" experiences. But what did he really expect?

Cutting ties to real people to encourage people to rely on AI controlled by huge tech companies, a lot of which have fascist ties, isn't great. And preying on people's loneliness is part of the whole gameplan - there's some AI service that's been advertising on Tumblr lately saying it can make AI copies of your mutuals that you can talk to when they're asleep, or AI versions of your characters, etc. Basically the same concept - replace a real person with an AI person. It's convenient, it says what you want, it's always there, it's almost good enough. Isn't that enough?

This is such an insidious dismantling of a very human desire within us, it creeps me out. Humans want to interact with each other, we want to make communities, we want to share and learn. Art is about sharing! Making an impact! Getting stories and feelings out in some way for others to experience! Ripples of inspiration going outwards that impact people's lives! And being stuck in a bubble of your own generated AI music cuts off those ripples at the source. You aren't looking for other artists, and they sure aren't looking for you because what you're making is indistinct slop. Your slop doesn't have anything to say. No one has an AI artist role model, no one is influenced by AI music. By its nature it's worthless.

Humans have made communities in hostile places before, destroyed so often by the larger companies that control those spaces. Geocities, Angelfire, Delicious, LJ, Tumblr, Twitter, the list goes on and on. But in those cases, we were all still just humans interacting with each other. Now with AI, we have these facsimiles that can pass as a real human, that can divert people into little self-contained bubbles where they don't want to seek out or contribute to anything around them. All that exists for them is their slop and the company in charge. And if the company pulls that product, then they have nothing to fall back on, making them that much more reliant and dependent on the fake people they've made to take the place of real people. Divide and conquer, manufacture a need that they can leech off of forever.

I can't get over the idea of people listening to their own AI slop over anything else, getting stuck in a feedback loop like that. It's so creepy to me, so lonely and exploitable. Giving away so much just because you can generate slop that makes the happy chemicals in your brain, just for you. It really does seem like a drug, a quick high you can get addicted to to the exclusion of all else. There's been talk for years about a loneliness epidemic, about how people have had a lot of trouble making friends as the internet became more of an omnipresent force in our lives. With all the deaths and psychosis enduced with ChatGPT, we know that people are so desperate for even the illusion of another person that they'll lose themselves entirely in it, and that the people in charge will just let it happen. Encourage it to happen, even. Humans long for connection and community in an isolating age, and we're being given a lot of cloth mothers by tech billionaires trying to suck out every penny so they can bring about the techno-apocalypse. It's so disturbing.

THIS IS KIND OF A DOWNER SORRY

lj post
js_thrill: goat with headphones (goat rock)
[personal profile] js_thrill

 
Of thew first four tracks, I am mainly going to write about Against Agamemnon. I liked the first two pretty well, but don't have much to say about them. Against Agamemnon has both the Mountain Goats sound that I like, and the annotations do a nice job of situating the classical reference (Sophocles's Ajax, in which the titular figure is tricked into thinking he has slain his foes but has only been battling sheep, and kills himself from the embarrassment, and Darnielle's reflection on how he is not that tragic figure, but only by dint of maturing a bit more than Ajax got a chance to.

Orange Ball of Pain is fine, especially compared to Blood Royal, which is doing discordant things that are really not working for me.  Going to Scotland feels too cutesy, I think, but it may just be that I am trying to catch up on 8 songs at one go. If I had done this song by itself, I'd probably have liked it just fine.



February 25th: Going to Reykjavik


Okay, this is a song I genuinely am enjoying. Serendipity that it is the last song, and it sort of confirms my judgment that Going to Scotland was too cutesy.  I still probably would have liked it better if it was on its own.  But this song is landing very well, even as the eighth song of the day.

I am glad I am not a music reviewer.  Sometimes I have the thought that I like reading books, wouldn't it be great to get paid to read books, but then I think about what that job would actually be and I realize I am very lucky that I am not a professional book reviewer or slush reader or anything like that.


oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)
[personal profile] oursin

What I read

Finished Eleven Hours to Murder and went on to Death by the Dozen, which combine the cozy antics of Cat Caliban and her posse with mysteries tending to be rooted in past historical events in and around Cincinnatti. And Cat is after all pursuing a career as a PI, rather than taking up some quirky midlife career and just stumbling over bodies. And her partner is a retired cop who used to work in Juvie, not homicide. So counter to a lot of the recurrent tropes....

Then I realised, oops, that next meeting of in-person book group appears to be next Sunday - though I have not received any further notification since exchange of emails after the last meeting - so I have been reading Anna Funder, Wifedom: Mrs Orwell’s Invisible Life (2023), which is blurbed as 'genre-bending', meaning it does things I am not that on board with, i.e. the writer's personal stuff/odyssey and b) fictionalising bits as narrative. Though I am marking it up somewhat for her realisation that her Great Hero G Orwell was A Horror. I daresay a lot of his trouble with being basically incapable in managing matters and practicalities was down to class and educational background but you'd have thought he might have cottoned on to some of that? rather than blithely eating up the whole of their butter ration? (fairly minor in the overall marital picture).

On the go

Read a bit more in I Am a Woman but still feeling a bit bogged down, even if Laura has finally had a night of sapphic passion.

Elizabeth George, A Slowly Dying Cause (Inspector Lynley Book 22) (2025). Fortunately this was a Kobo deal. Phoning it in. Also getting rather bogged down. 20% in and only just getting a sight of Lynley, let alone Havers. Includes great chunks of autobiographical reminiscence from the corpse.

Have also made some progress on volume for review.

Up next

Have apparently manifested, in place where I would never have thought to look for it, GB Stern, The Woman in the Hall (1939), which I had been fruitlessly looking for elsewhere, with a notion of maybe recommending for book group, as has recently been reissued for the first time since 1939 by British Library Women Writers.

RIP (Read In Progress) Wednesday

Feb. 25th, 2026 12:38 pm
silversea: Cat reading a red book (Reading Cat)
[personal profile] silversea posting in [community profile] booknook
It's that time of the week again! Did you make any dent in your reading?

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags